Biostatistics 1:69-88 (2000)
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design
1 Department of Economics, University of
California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2 Department of Statistics, Science Center
709, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
3 Division of Biostatistics, Department of
Medicine, University School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute
for Health Care, Indiana, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
Many randomized experiments suffer from noncompliance. Some of these experiments, so-called encouragement designs, can be expected to have especially large amounts of noncompliance, because encouragement to take the treatment rather than the treatment itself is randomly assigned to individuals. We present an extended framework for the analysis of data from such experiments with a binary treatment, binary encouragement, and background covariates. There are two key features of this framework: we use an instrumental variables approach to link intention-to-treat effects to treatment effects and we adopt a Bayesian approach for inference and sensitivity analysis. This framework is illustrated in a medical example concerning the effects of inoculation for influenza. In this example, the analyses suggest that positive estimates of the intention-to-treat effect need not be due to the treatment itself, but rather to the encouragement to take the treatment: the intention-to-treat effect for the subpopulation who would be inoculated whether or not encouraged is estimated to be approximately as large as the intention-to-treat effect for the subpopulation whose inoculation status would agree with their (randomized) encouragement status whether or not encouraged. Thus, our methods suggest that global intention-to-treat estimates, although often regarded as conservative, can be too coarse and even misleading when taken as summarizing the evidence in the data for the effects of treatments.
Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Causal inference; Instrumental variables; Noncompliance; Rubin Causal Model; Potential outcomes; Treatment effects; Sensitivity analysis
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Jo Bias Mechanisms in Intention-to-Treat Analysis With Data Subject to Treatment Noncompliance and Missing Outcomes Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, June 1, 2008; 33(2): 158 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. McConnell, E. A. Stuart, and B. Devaney The Truncation-by-Death Problem: What To Do in an Experimental Evaluation When the Outcome Is Not Always Defined Eval Rev, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 157 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Roy, J. W. Hogan, and B. H. Marcus Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments Biostat., April 1, 2008; 9(2): 277 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L Bellamy, J. Y Lin, and T. R T. Have An introduction to causal modeling in clinical trials Clinical Trials, February 1, 2007; 4(1): 58 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Kim Effects of a Voluntary Summer Reading Intervention on Reading Achievement: Results From a Randomized Field Trial Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(4): 335 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. R White Uses and limitations of randomization-based efficacy estimators Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 327 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G Baker and B. S Kramer Simple maximum likelihood estimates of efficacy in randomized trials and before-and-after studies, with implications for meta-analysis Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 349 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Dunn, M. Maracy, and B. Tomenson Estimating treatment effects from randomized clinical trials with noncompliance and loss to follow-up: the role of instrumental variable methods Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 369 - 395. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Rubin Teaching Statistical Inference for Causal Effects in Experiments and Observational Studies Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2004; 29(3): 343 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. DUNN, M. MARACY, C. DOWRICK, J. L. AYUSO-MATEOS, O. S. DALGARD, H. PAGE, V. LEHTINEN, P. CASEY, C. WILKINSON, J. L. VAZQUEZ-BARQUERO, et al. Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 183(4): 323 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Zhang and D. B. Rubin Estimation of Causal Effects via Principal Stratification When Some Outcomes are Truncated by "Death" Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2003; 28(4): 353 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Jo Estimation of Intervention Effects with Noncompliance: Alternative Model Specifications Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2002; 27(4): 385 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Mealli and D. B. Rubin Discussion of "Estimation of Intervention Effects with Noncompliance: Alternative Model Specifications" by Booil Jo Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2002; 27(4): 411 - 415. [PDF]
|
|