Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Biostatistics 3:33-50 (2002)
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival

Robin Henderson, Peter Diggle, and Angela Dobson

Medical Statistics Unit, Lancaster University, LA1 4YF, UK. Robin.Henderson{at}lancaster.ac.uk
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA

Methods for the combined analysis of survival time and longitudinal biomarker data have been developed in recent years, with most emphasis on modelling and estimation. This paper focuses on the use of longitudinal marker trajectories as individual-level surrogates for survival. A score test for association which requires only standard methods for implementation is derived for the initial identification of candidate biomarkers. Methods for assessing efficacy of markers are discussed and a measure contrasting conditional and marginal distibutions is proposed. An application using prothrombin index as biomarker for survival of liver cirrhosis patients is included.

Keywords: Explained variation; Joint modelling; Residual lifetime distribution; Score test; Surrogates


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
C. Proust-Lima and J. M. G. Taylor
Development and validation of a dynamic prognostic tool for prostate cancer recurrence using repeated measures of posttreatment PSA: a joint modeling approach
Biostat., July 1, 2009; 10(3): 535 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
M. N Lassere
The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 303 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
T. Cai, M. S. Pepe, Y. Zheng, T. Lumley, and N. S. Jenny
The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times
Biostat., April 1, 2006; 7(2): 182 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.