Biostatistics 3:33-50 (2002)
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival
Medical Statistics Unit, Lancaster University, LA1 4YF, UK. Robin.Henderson{at}lancaster.ac.uk
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA
Methods for the combined analysis of survival time and longitudinal biomarker data have been developed in recent years, with most emphasis on modelling and estimation. This paper focuses on the use of longitudinal marker trajectories as individual-level surrogates for survival. A score test for association which requires only standard methods for implementation is derived for the initial identification of candidate biomarkers. Methods for assessing efficacy of markers are discussed and a measure contrasting conditional and marginal distibutions is proposed. An application using prothrombin index as biomarker for survival of liver cirrhosis patients is included.
Keywords: Explained variation; Joint modelling; Residual lifetime distribution; Score test; Surrogates
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Proust-Lima and J. M. G. Taylor Development and validation of a dynamic prognostic tool for prostate cancer recurrence using repeated measures of posttreatment PSA: a joint modeling approach Biostat., July 1, 2009; 10(3): 535 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N Lassere The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 303 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Cai, M. S. Pepe, Y. Zheng, T. Lumley, and N. S. Jenny The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times Biostat., April 1, 2006; 7(2): 182 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

