Skip Navigation


Biostatistics Advance Access originally published online on May 4, 2005
Biostatistics 2005 6(4):505-519; doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxi031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
6/4/505    most recent
kxi031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dominici, F.
Right arrow Articles by Zeger, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dominici, F.
Right arrow Articles by Zeger, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Smooth quantile ratio estimation with regression: estimating medical expenditures for smoking-attributable diseases

Francesca Dominici* and Scott L. Zeger

Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21205-3179, USA fdominic{at}jhsph.edu

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

The methodological development of this paper is motivated by a common problem in econometrics where we are interested in estimating the difference in the average expenditures between two populations, say with and without a disease, as a function of the covariates. For example, let Y1 and Y2 be two nonnegative random variables denoting the health expenditures for cases and controls. Smooth Quantile Ratio Estimation (SQUARE) is a novel approach for estimating {Delta} = E[Y1] – E[Y2] by smoothing across percentiles the log-transformed ratio of the two quantile functions. Dominici et al. (2005) have shown that SQUARE defines a large class of estimators of {Delta}, is more efficient than common parametric and nonparametric estimators of {Delta}, and is consistent and asymptotically normal. However, in applications it is often desirable to estimate {Delta}(x) = E[Y1|x] – E[Y2|x], that is, the difference in means as a function of x. In this paper we extend SQUARE to a regression model and we introduce a two-part regression SQUARE for estimating {Delta}(x) as a function of x. We use the first part of the model to estimate the probability of incurring any costs and the second part of the model to estimate the mean difference in health expenditures, given that a nonzero cost is observed. In the second part of the model, we apply the basic definition of SQUARE for positive costs to compare expenditures for the cases and controls having ‘similar’ covariate profiles. We determine strata of cases and control with ‘similar’ covariate profiles by the use of propensity score matching. We then apply two-part regression SQUARE to the 1987 National Medicare Expenditure Survey to estimate the difference {Delta}(x) between persons suffering from smoking-attributable diseases and persons without these diseases as a function of the propensity of getting the disease. Using a simulation study, we compare frequentist properties of two-part regression SQUARE with maximum likelihood estimators for the log-transformed expenditures.

Keywords: Comparing means; Health expenditures; Log-normal; Propensity scores; Q–Q plots; Quantile regression; Regression splines; Skewed distributions; Smoking


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Katz, P. Christian, F. Dominici, and S. L. Zeger
Treatment Effects of Maternal Micronutrient Supplementation Vary by Percentiles of the Birth Weight Distribution in Rural Nepal
J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1389 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.