Skip Navigation


Biostatistics Advance Access originally published online on November 21, 2005
Biostatistics 2006 7(2):286-301; doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxj007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/2/286    most recent
kxj007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chipman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tibshirani, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chipman, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tibshirani, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Hybrid hierarchical clustering with applications to microarray data

Hugh Chipman*

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada B4P 2R6 hugh.chipman{at}acadiau.ca

Robert Tibshirani

Department of Health Research and Policy and Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 tibs{at}stanford.edu

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

In this paper, we propose a hybrid clustering method that combines the strengths of bottom-up hierarchical clustering with that of top-down clustering. The first method is good at identifying small clusters but not large ones; the strengths are reversed for the second method. The hybrid method is built on the new idea of a mutual cluster: a group of points closer to each other than to any other points. Theoretical connections between mutual clusters and bottom-up clustering methods are established, aiding in their interpretation and providing an algorithm for identification of mutual clusters. We illustrate the technique on simulated and real microarray datasets.

Keywords: Bottom-up clustering; Mutual cluster; Top-down clustering


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BiostatisticsHome page
G. Nowak and R. Tibshirani
Complementary hierarchical clustering
Biostat., July 1, 2008; 9(3): 467 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.