Skip Navigation


Biostatistics Advance Access originally published online on December 3, 2007
Biostatistics 2008 9(2):216-233; doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/2/216    most recent
kxm037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times

T. Cai*

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA tcai{at}hsph.harvard.edu

S. Cheng

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0560, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Recent advancement in technology promises to yield a multitude of tests for disease diagnosis and prognosis. When there are multiple sources of information available, it is often of interest to construct a composite score that can provide better classification accuracy than any individual measurement. In this paper, we consider robust procedures for optimally combining tests when test results are measured prior to disease onset and disease status evolves over time. To account for censoring of disease onset time, the most commonly used approach to combining tests to detect subsequent disease status is to fit a proportional hazards model (Cox, 1972) and use the estimated risk score. However, simulation studies suggested that such a risk score may have poor accuracy when the proportional hazards assumption fails. We propose the use of a nonparametric transformation model (Han, 1987) as a working model to derive an optimal composite score with theoretical justification. We demonstrate that the proposed score is the optimal score when the model holds and is optimal "on average" among linear scores even if the model fails. Time-dependent sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve functions are used to quantify the accuracy of the resulting composite score. We provide consistent and asymptotically Gaussian estimators of these accuracy measures. A simple model-free resampling procedure is proposed to obtain all consistent variance estimators. We illustrate the new proposals with simulation studies and an analysis of a breast cancer gene expression data set.

Keywords: Censored surival time; Nonparametric transformation models; Resampling; Robust estimation; Time-specific classification accuracy

Received January 2, 2007; revised September 14, 2007; accepted for publication September 18, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.