Skip Navigation


Biostatistics Advance Access originally published online on January 18, 2008
Biostatistics 2008 9(3):513-522; doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
9/3/513    most recent
kxm052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwinderman, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwinderman, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stoker, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Statistical models for quantifying diagnostic accuracy with multiple lesions per patient

Aeilko H. Zwinderman*, Afina S. Glas and Patrick M. Bossuyt

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, J2-203, Amsterdam Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
a.h.zwinderman{at}amc.uva.nl

Jasper Florie, Shandra Bipat and Jaap Stoker

Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

We propose random-effects models to summarize and quantify the accuracy of the diagnosis of multiple lesions on a single image without assuming independence between lesions. The number of false-positive lesions was assumed to be distributed as a Poisson mixture, and the proportion of true-positive lesions was assumed to be distributed as a binomial mixture. We considered univariate and bivariate, both parametric and nonparametric mixture models. We applied our tools to simulated data and data of a study assessing diagnostic accuracy of virtual colonography with computed tomography in 200 patients suspected of having one or more polyps.

Keywords: Beta-binomial model; Multiple lesions; Nonparametric mixture models; Poisson–gamma model

Received January 31, 2007; revised June 20, 2007; revised October 11, 2007; accepted for publication November 20, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.