Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Biostatistics 3:277-287 (2002)
© 2002 Oxford University Press

A sample size adjustment procedure for clinical trials based on conditional power

Gang Li, Weichung J. Shih, Tailiang Xie and Jiang Lu

Gang Li. Organon Inc., 375 Mt Pleasant Ave., West Orange, NJ 07052, USA G.Li{at}organoninc.com
Weichung J. Shih. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA shihwj{at}umdnj.edu
Tailiang Xie. Whitehall-Robins Healthcare, Madison, NJ 07940, USA
Jiang Lu. University of the Witwatersrand, PO WITS, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa

When designing clinical trials, researchers often encounter the uncertainty in the treatment effect or variability assumptions. Hence the sample size calculation at the planning stage of a clinical trial may also be questionable. Adjustment of the sample size during the mid-course of a clinical trial has become a popular strategy lately. In this paper we propose a procedure for calculating additional sample size needed based on conditional power, and adjusting the final-stage critical value to protect the overall type-I error rate. Compared to other previous procedures, the proposed procedure uses the definition of the conditional type-I error directly without appealing to an extra special function for it. It has better flexibility in setting up interim decision rules and the final-stage test is a likelihood ratio test.

Keywords: Conditional power; Interim analysis; Sample size re-estimation; Two-stage design


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.