Skip Navigation

Biostatistics 2004 5(4):633-648; doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxh014
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Grunwald, G. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Grunwald, G. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Biostatistics Vol. 5 No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Mixed models for the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns

Melanie L. Bell*

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
melanie.bell{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz

Gary K. Grunwald

Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

The statistical methodology for the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns in complex designs such as those including replications is fairly undeveloped. A mixed model is developed in conjunction with maximum pseudolikelihood and generalized linear mixed modeling by extending Baddeley and Turner's (2000, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 42, 283–322) work on pseudolikelihood for single patterns. A simulation experiment is performed on parameter estimation. Fixed- and mixed-effect models are compared, and in some respects the mixed model is found to be superior. An example using the Strauss process for modeling neuron locations in post-mortem brain slices is shown.

Keywords: Berman–Turner device; Generalized linear mixed models; Maximum pseudolikelihood; Pairwise interaction; Strauss process


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.