Skip Navigation

Biostatistics 2005 6(1):39-44; doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxh016
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tilley, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carter, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tilley, B. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Biostatistics Vol. 6 No. 1 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved.

Quasi-likelihood estimation for relative risk regression models

Rickey E. Carter, Stuart R. Lipsitz and Barbara C. Tilley

Department of Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA carterre{at}musc.edu

For a prospective randomized clinical trial with two groups, the relative risk can be used as a measure of treatment effect and is directly interpretable as the ratio of success probabilities in the new treatment group versus the placebo group. For a prospective study with many covariates and a binary outcome (success or failure), relative risk regression may be of interest. If we model the log of the success probability as a linear function of covariates, the regression coefficients are log-relative risks. However, using such a log–linear model with a Bernoulli likelihood can lead to convergence problems in the Newton–Raphson algorithm. This is likely to occur when the success probabilities are close to one. A constrained likelihood method proposed by Wacholder (1986, American Journal of Epidemiology 123, 174–184), also has convergence problems. We propose a quasi-likelihood method of moments technique in which we naively assume the Bernoulli outcome is Poisson, with the mean (success probability) following a log–linear model. We use the Poisson maximum likelihood equations to estimate the regression coefficients without constraints. Using method of moment ideas, one can show that the estimates using the Poisson likelihood will be consistent and asymptotically normal. We apply these methods to a double-blinded randomized trial in primary biliary cirrhosis of the liver (Markus et al., 1989, New England Journal of Medicine 320, 1709–1713).

Keywords: Bernoulli likelihood; Constrained MLE; Convergence problems; Method-of-moments; Poisson regression


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. Worsham, U. Raju, M. Lu, A. Kapke, J. Cheng, and S. R. Wolman
Multiplicity of Benign Breast Lesions Is a Risk Factor for Progression to Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5474 - 5479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.