Nonparametric confidence intervals for the one- and two-sample problems
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Box 357232, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, Health Services Research & Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Metropolitan Park West, 1100 Olive Way #1400, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Box 357232, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. azhou{at}u.washington.edu
Confidence intervals for the mean of one sample and the difference in means of two independent samples based on the ordinary-t statistic suffer deficiencies when samples come from skewed families. In this article we evaluate several existing techniques and propose new methods to improve coverage accuracy. The methods examined include the ordinary-t, the bootstrap-t, the biased-corrected acceleration and three new intervals based on transformation of the t-statistic. Our study shows that our new transformation intervals and the bootstrap-t intervals give best coverage accuracy for a variety of skewed distributions, and that our new transformation intervals have shorter interval lengths.
Keywords: BCa; Bootstrap; Confidence interval; Cost data; Edgeworth expansion; Positive skewness
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Jette, R. Leger, K. Thibaudeau, C. Benquet, M. Robitaille, I. Pellerin, V. Paradis, P. van Wyk, K. Pham, and D. P. Bridon Human Growth Hormone-Releasing Factor (hGRF)1-29-Albumin Bioconjugates Activate the GRF Receptor on the Anterior Pituitary in Rats: Identification of CJC-1295 as a Long-Lasting GRF Analog Endocrinology, July 1, 2005; 146(7): 3052 - 3058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
