Skip Navigation



Biostatistics Advance Access published online on August 28, 2008
Biostatistics, doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxn029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/2/228    most recent
kxn029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pepe, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Pepe, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population

Ying Huang*

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-A410, Seattle, WA 98109, USA yhuang124{at}gmail.com

Margaret Sullivan Pepe

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M2-B500, Seattle, WA 98109, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

The classification accuracy of a continuous marker is typically evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In this paper, we study an alternative conceptual framework, the "percentile value." In this framework, the controls only provide a reference distribution to standardize the marker. The analysis proceeds by analyzing the standardized marker in cases. The approach is shown to be equivalent to ROC analysis. Advantages are that it provides a framework familiar to a broad spectrum of biostatisticians and it opens up avenues for new statistical techniques in biomarker evaluation. We develop several new procedures based on this framework for comparing biomarkers and biomarker performance in different populations. We develop methods that adjust such comparisons for covariates. The methods are illustrated on data from 2 cancer biomarker studies.

Keywords: Biomarker; Classification; Covariate adjustment; Percentile value; ROC; Standardization

Received September 13, 2007; revised January 14, 2008; revised July 7, 2008; accepted for publication July 30, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.